2 days ago
4
Upgrade to High-Speed Internet for only ₱1499/month!
Enjoy up to 100 Mbps fiber broadband, perfect for browsing, streaming, and gaming.
Visit Suniway.ph to learn
Former presidential spokesperson and congressman Harry Roque Jr. answers questions at the House of Representatives Quad Committee hearing on Aug .23, 2024.
HREP
MANILA, Philippines — The Supreme Court has dismissed a petition filed by former presidential spokesman Harry Roque seeking to block the House Quad Committee from enforcing an arrest order and compelling his participation in its probe into Philippine Offshore Gaming Operators.
In a decision promulgated Dec. 3, 2025, the high court ruled that the case had become moot.
The ruling, penned by Associate Justice Samuel Gaerlan, said judicial intervention was no longer necessary after the House panel lifted its contempt order against Roque and the 19th Congress adjourned on June 11, 2025.
The case stemmed from a 2024 inquiry by the Quad Committee, a joint body composed of the House committees on Dangerous Drugs, Public Order and Safety, Human Rights, and Public Accounts.
The panel was tasked with investigating alleged illegal activities linked to the POGO industry.
Roque attended some hearings but was later cited in contempt and ordered detained after failing to submit documents and skipping subsequent proceedings.
He challenged the subpoenas, arguing they violated his right to privacy and protection against self-incrimination.
Roque also sought a writ of amparo, claiming the House actions threatened his life, liberty and security.
The Supreme Court had earlier denied the amparo petition in October 2024, saying the remedy applies to cases of extralegal killings and enforced disappearances, not congressional contempt cases.
RELATED: Supreme Court denies 'amparo' protection for Harry Roque
Ruling
In dismissing the petition for certiorari and prohibition, the court cited the principle of mootness, noting that a case is considered moot when a ruling can no longer provide practical relief.
The court also clarified the limits of Congress’ contempt powers.
"Nevertheless, the Court took the opportunity to rule that the period of detention under the legislative contempt power is temporally limited to the duration of the legislative inquiry under which the power is invoked, or of the Congress which invoked said power," the decision read.
The court said a legislative inquiry ends either when a committee submits its final report or when Congress adjourns its final session.
In this instance, both conditions were met: the Quadcomm submitted its final report—which included a proposed bill to ban POGOs — on June 10, 2025, and the 19th Congress adjourned the following day.
"With the lifting of the contempt order, the cessation of the Quad Committee's inquiry, and the expiration of the 19th Congress, this Court can no longer grant any practical relief to Atty. Roque. The petition must perforce be dismissed," the court said.
